I'm not sure what you expect :)  You've found consistent behavior, and it 
matches the behavior documented in 
http://www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/VENDORS/MICSFT/WindowsBestFit/bestfit1252.txt

IANA http://www.iana.org/assignments/charset-reg/windows-1252 points to both 
the non-best fit "standard" mapping and he best fit mapping.

-Shawn

From: Buck Golemon [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, December 7, 2012 3:03 PM
To: unicode; Shawn Steele
Subject: Re: data for cp1252

One week: bump.

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Buck Golemon 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Shawn, can I get your comments?
Does this seem irrelevant?

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Buck Golemon 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I've compiled cross-browser data on the question of how to cp1252 decodes the 
byte 0x81.

http://bukzor.github.com/encodings/cp1252.html

In summary, all browsers agree that it decodes to U+81. Opera initially thought 
it was undefined, but changed their mind in version 12 (the current version).


Reply via email to