On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Jukka K. Korpela <[email protected]> wrote:
> Then again, Latin is no different from Cyrillic, Greek, or Arabic, for > example, in this respect. In an apparent attempt to save space, the script > names are also links to basic blocks of characters for the scripts. This > would not be my cup of tea, but I can well understand the reasoning behind > this. Using “Basic Latin” etc. as lower-level items would have been more > logical here, but not necessarily more practical. > The page has been modified to add an alias for Basic Latin (ASCII) under the Latin heading. markus
