What is the difference between the proposed LRI and RLI with, respectively, <FSI,LRE> and <FSI,RLE> ?
Why do we need LRI and RLI as well, when FSI should be enough for all isolates (for which there's no good reason to force the direction of their embedded texts when FSI/PDI is exactly needed because we don't want to know the direction of the outer text and the direction of the inner text, but just want to create a simple and effective embedding, where LRE and RLE would even not been needed at all, and even deprecated, alorg with PDF) ? The CSS equivalent for the FSI/PDI would be a single property "unicode-bidi:isolate" and nothing more (other values of "unicode-bidi:" would be deprecated as well, except possibly LRO/RLO for locally changing the mirroring of a single character, in which case we would embed it between <FSI,RLO> and <PDI>, because there's no other way to mirror a character withjout changing its direction or changing the direction of the text after it, and in HTML we would typically use <bdo style="unicode-bidi:isolate" dir="rtl">..</bdo> or some newer semantic element like <bdi dir="rtl">...</bdi>). 2013/1/16 Roozbeh Pournader <[email protected]>: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Jukka K. Korpela <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Code points 2066, 2067, and 2068 are unassigned. > > > Not anymore. See the pipeline and the latest proposed update of UAX#9: > http://www.unicode.org/alloc/Pipeline.html > http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr9/proposed.html
