On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:35:53 +0100 Joó Ádám <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Blame the invention of the dot over the i, or the convention of > > omitting it when adding accents, or the adoption much later of a > > specifically dotless i into the Turkish alphabet... > Or the invention of a soft accent, for that matter. If the dot would > be explicitly encoded in all cases, no problem would arise. And that comes down to the refusal to give U+0069 the canonical decomposition <U+0131 LATIN SMALL LETTER DOTLESS I, U+0307 COMBINING DOT ABOVE>. Richard.
