2013/2/5 Richard Wordingham <[email protected]>: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:16:47 +0100 > Philippe Verdy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> A process can be FULLY conforming by preserving the canonical >> equivalence and treating ALL strings that are canonically equivalent, >> without having to normalize them in any recommanded form,... > > Try doing UCA collation with <U+0302 COMBINING CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT, > U+0067 LATIN SMALL LETTER G> being a collation element (with arbitrary > collation elements) without doing normalisation.
<0302, 0067> is defective, and its normalisation is still <0302, 0067>, it is NOT canonically equivalent to <0067, 0302> I was not speaking about arbitrary collation elements containing defective sequences, is is a real case ? Consider how you > would handle <U+011D LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH CIRCUMFLEX, U+011D, > U+011D>! with which collation rule set ? including defective collection elements ?
