On 3/9/2013 3:41 PM, Philippe Verdy wrote:
2013/3/9 Asmus Freytag <[email protected]>:
This appears to be another possible mistake. However, the Greek script does
provide a context which could be used to select the "ano teleia" appearance
and properties (unless you tell me that the character appears in Greek
surrounded by non-Greek alphabet characters).
And even this basic rule will be defeated in maths formulas where the MIDDLE
DOT 00B7 has been used as a common multiplication operator, along with numbers
and variables named after Greek letter. Of course Unicode has now distinctive
symbols for maths, but that's another story.
RIght, because 22C5 exists for that purpose.
There's no reliably way to contextually infer an ano teleia rendering
(on the middle of the x-height instead of the middle of the M-height,
the intended redering for 00B7 which also works when the middle dot is
used as an appended diacritic after the letter L/l in Catalan) where
it would break the common appearance between digits with the intended
same meaning as a multiplication sign, for text that are not encoded
using Maths operators but legacy Greek letters and 00B7.
