Forgot to add the topis the first time, re-posting. Sorry for inconvenience.
Konstantin 2013/3/18 Konstantin Ritt <[email protected]>: > Hi list, > > The user reports Korean text rendering issue with any modern Hangul > font when U+115F and U+1160 are handled like default_ignorable code > points. > [quote]With input string "U+115F U+1161 U+112B U+1160", we get three > zero-width glyphs instead of two; this is wrong.[/quote] > I did check some Hangul font and found that either U+115F or U+1160 > zero-advances, not both. When handling them like default ignorable, > the rendered text seems to lack some advancing. > Since I know nothing about Korean typography, I'd like to ask here: > what is the reason for U+115F and U+1160 to be default ignorables and > shouldn't that be revised? > > regards, > Konstantin
