On Tuesday 23 April 2013, Philippe Verdy <[email protected]> wrote:
 
> There's also noather issue: your proposal now uses identifiers that will be 
> resolved in a registry database you are the only one to control.
 
Not at all. The registry would be controlled by an International Standards 
Organization committee. 
 
As you have raised the matter, here is a quote from a document that I submitted 
to the ISO/IEC 10646 committee in January 2012.
 
quote
 
My current thinking is that an ISO committee entity would choose sentences and 
symbols and then approach the ISO/IEC 10646 committee on an inter-committee 
liaison basis to ask for character code points to be assigned to the symbol and 
sentence pairs. For the avoidance of doubt I have, as at the time of preparing 
this document, made no application to ISO about such a committee entity 
carrying out such activities.
 
My thinking is that that ISO committee entity could potentially be one of the 
following.
 
1. A new ISO committee, generated for the purpose.
 
2. The ISO/IEC 10646 committee, or a subcommittee of the ISO/IEC 10646 
committee.
 
3. An existing ISO committee, other than the ISO 10646 committee, or a 
subcommittee of that committee.
 
end quote
  
William Overington
 
23 April 2013



Reply via email to