On 8 Jul 2013, at 21:35, "Whistler, Ken" <[email protected]> wrote:
> A much more productive approach, it seems to me, would be instead to try to > establish information about various, identifiable typographical traditions > for use of punctuation around the world, and then associate "exemplar sets" > of punctuation used with those traditions. Such an approach, I assert, would > tend to be much more robust (as well as more comprehensible) than definition > of very fragile set definitions associating lists of scripts one-by-one with > various characters. And publish this where? That is why Richard is interested in StriptExtensions, I gather. Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
