Sorry to say but a lot of nonsense in your message.
For status of the Unicode Consortium please refer to 
http://www.unicode.org/consortium/consort.html

Unicode has always been a member based nonprofit organization and was always 
welcoming grants of any sort to help its work. Many experts and members have 
benefited from various organization to facilitate specific encoding work, just 
look at the encoding proposals that have been posted for decades to see 
examples.
Tangut is just another example of a targeted grant among dozens. Most of us are 
volunteering in large part to get this work done.

The only recent change was to go from a 501-c2 to a 501-c3 organization which 
allows donating organizations to have additional tax benefit under US tax laws 
(usual disclaimer about not being a tax advice). That's all. It may make easier 
for some US based constituency to donate to the consortium.

Again refer to the page linked above and stop speculating on what the 
consortium does. There is no change on its mode of operation. It is still 
member based and members have the final say (either directly or indirectly 
through the board and the officers) on all decisions made by the consortium. 
Tangut encoding has been languishing for years, partially for logistic issues 
having to do with the fact that Tangut experts are spread all over the world. I 
welcome any initiative that get Tangut from the void its encoding proposal has 
been in for years.

Michel
(wearing the Unicode Consortium Secretary hat)


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Philippe Verdy
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 1:16 PM
To: unicode Unicode Discussion
Subject: Re: Henry Luce Foundation Grant to Unicode in Support of Encoding 
Tangut

Is the Unicode Consortium allowed to receive dedicated grants like a public 
foundation under US law ?

And if so, how does this conform with the UTC working policies ? I suppose that 
the Henry Luce Foundation (HLF) will monitor the progresses (to provide 
payments) but will it influence the agenda and mean that the Tangut encoding 
will be accelerated, using inputs whose sources will come from only from this 
Foundation or the UCB SEI ? Can this acceleration be compatible with ISO WG2 
agenda and other national interests ?

So why the HLF did not simply join the UTC with normal membership to 
participate directly in the encoding process but without more rights to fix the 
working agenda ? Is this a new kind (of UTC membership (and more powerful, even 
if it does not include vote rights...) ?

The recent announcement causes some questions. because this changes the current 
practices. The Unicode Consortium for now is still registered as a commercial 
organization which can then only deliver some limited services in exachange of 
a payment (such services include membership fees, sales of publications, 
training programs, participations to live events, and so on...)

But this may be a sign that the Unicode Consortium is about to have its own 
status changed to become a non-profit charity foundation dedicated to wordlwide 
promotion of education and culture. Thanks. But this should be clear, and some 
status will have to be changed to be compatible with US law about non-profit 
charities.

We've seen another sign of such evolution by Unicode opening its repository of 
working documents. But the main evolutions would include more open membership 
conditions, and non discrimination between members. It would change radically 
the working methods. Or may be it is just the UTC that will become a 
foundation, founded by grants from the Consortium and for other organizations.

The recent announcement is then very intrigating about how the Consortium will 
work for the future, it's probably unavoidable that it will become a 
foundation, when almost all commercial needs have been solved and most 
remaining issues are about either:

- rare scripts or historic script (whose usage will likely never reach a point 
of commercial profitability)

- complex text-handling algorithms based on heuristics which have many 
exceptions and many competing algorothms for various uses, so that they will 
become standards with lots of difficulties or the winning standard or some 
algorithms will not come from Unicode but from other working groups (commercial 
or collaborative open-sourced).

Do we expect then 'The Unicode Consoritum, Inc." to be dissolved later and 
replaced by "The Unicode Foundation" which could emerge soon, first in parallel 
to the Consortium (and possibly grouping the efforts currently made in the CLDR 
TC, the UTC, the BSD SEI, and other cultural foundations including the 
Wikimedia Foundation, or Unesco and similar international agencies) ? Will that 
help receive dedicated public grants from government sources or from the 
general public (with possible tax deduction) ? And how will the current 
policies be enforced (notably stability policies) ?


2013/9/16 Philippe Verdy <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Is the Unicode Consortium allowed to receive dedicated grants like a public 
foundation under US law ?

And if so, how does this conform with the UTC working policies ? I suppose that 
the Henry Luce Foundation (HLF) will monitor the progresses (to provide 
payments) but will it influence the agenda and mean that the Tangut encoding 
will be accelerated, using inputs whose sources will come from only from this 
Foundation or the UCB SEI ? Can this acceleration be compatible with ISO WG2 
agenda and other national interests ?

So why the HLF did not simply join the UTC with normal membership to 
participate directly in the encoding process but without more rights to fix the 
working agenda ? Is this a new kind (of UTC membership (and more powerful, even 
if it does not include vote rights...) ?


2013/9/16 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

The Consortium is very pleased to announce the generous grant made by the Henry 
Luce Foundation<https://www.hluce.org/asia.aspx> to support progress on 
encoding Tangut. The Luce Foundation has made a one-time grant to the Unicode 
Consortium to support a December 2013 meeting to further progress the Tangut 
script for its eventual incorporation into the Unicode Standard and the 
associated ISO/IEC 10646 International Standard. The meeting will bring 
together scholars of Tangut and experts in the character encoding process to 
agree on the character repertoire for this large and complex script. Work on 
this grant is directed by Dr. Deborah Anderson, Technical Director of the 
Consortium and the Project Leader of the UC Berkeley's Script Encoding 
Initiative.

http://unicode-inc.blogspot.com/2013/09/henry-luce-foundation-grant-to-unicode.html


Reply via email to