Hasn't http://www.unicode.org/standard/where/#Variant_Shapes explained it once and for all?
Leo On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:42 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > FWIW, a blog post prompted by discussions in the wake of a DejaVu font use > of N-form over n-form capital ŋ ("eng" or "engma"): > > "The 'eng' times for unified capital ŋ?" > http://niamey.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-eng-times-for-unified-capital.html > > It's not a new issue, but was leaving the two main forms of capital eng as > variants of one character the best course of action? In any event, it's > probably more complex to disunify now (if that were to be decided) than it > would have been, say, 10-12 years ago. > > Don Osborn > > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T > > >
