In my opinion, this is going too far for the UTC. Such guidance can only come from Russian authorities for the application of its law, where it is relevant to apply it. Even for the Euro, there's ample variations allowed in Unicode, that does not affect conformance, even if there may be further restrictions on them in specific contexts.
We are out of scope of TUS, unless there's a clear standard coming from law or from a national standard body, defining a clear context of use where a more precise shape design would be normatively used (and should then be present in fonts in one of the implemented variants). 2013/12/12 William_J_G Overington <[email protected]> > Michael Everson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I’m already on it. > > Excellent. > > Would it be possible please for encoding to include specific official > guidance, going back to a source with provenance, as to whether a glyph for > the symbol in a serif font should or should not have serifs? > > William Overington > > 12 December 2013 > > > >
