On 12/12/2013 6:38 PM, Leo Broukhis wrote:
> Italic is not plain text.

Is this the only thing that would have stopped you from advocating disunification?

> Yeah. To heck with the end user and their pathetic preferences.

Is a preference to have traditional and simplified CJK characters disunified more or less pathetic (and why) than the preference at hand?

The process has been plagued with the lack of knowledgeable and engaged members from the affected communities where it comes to certain regions.

Ultimately any unification decision makes tradeoffs. Without the communities involved, what you have is experts acting as self-appointed representatives. Because tradeoffs by their nature have not only benefits but also costs, I can fully understand a reluctance to change the tradeoff based on any form of arms-length interaction.

In the CJK case, the communities were very actively involved - not all their constituents were not unanimous, but they took part in the development and ultimately approved the tradeoffs involved after a lengthy and formal process.

As to whether the governments are the best representatives of their communities depends very much on circumstances, so I'd like to support a restatement of the comment made earlier:

This issue will not be really settled until the eng-using communities get together and resolve which tradeoff works best for them. Let's hope they do, and soon.

A./

Leo


On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Michael Everson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 12 Dec 2013, at 22:25, Leo Broukhis <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    > Hmmm... As a person with Russian as the first language I can
    assure you that from any literate Russian-speaking person's
    perspective italic ū is an unacceptable and *WRONG* representation
    of п (because in Russian, unlike Serbian, there is й). Should we
    bother disunifying?

    Italic is not plain text.

    > > I suppose nothing will happen until the governments of
    eng-using countries come together with a proposal.
    >
    > Let's hope so. I wish they never do.

    <irony>Yeah. To heck with the end user and their pathetic
    preferences.</irony>

    Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/



Reply via email to