Anne: Given that the intent is to implement exactly the whatwg spec, and the group is currently called "whatwg" (even though it may eventually become a historical artifact), is "whatwg-1252" most appropriate?
Norbert Lindenberg previously suggested standardizing some kind of disambiguation. http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2012-m12/0022.html Do you most prefer the s/web-/cp/ pattern? On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]>wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Markus Scherer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Buck Golemon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I've been considering naming it cp1252-whatwg. > > > > It would be nicer to put the organization name first, such as > whatwg-cp1252 > > or maybe better html-cp1252. That would be more like ibm-932 and such. > > If you want to support more encodings than > http://encoding.spec.whatwg.org/ defines I suggest using the prefix > "web-". The organization may change and this is not tied to HTML. > > > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/ >
_______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
