Sorry, I took the wrong line (because I typed 05EA instead of 05AE) 05AE ; 228 # Mn HEBREW ACCENT ZINOR
You're right, the combining class 228 does not block the composition. 2014-03-10 20:28 GMT+01:00 Philippe Verdy <[email protected]>: > toNFC(0061 0305 0315 0300 05AE 0062) -> > > From > DerivedCombiningClass.txt<http://www.unicode.org/Public/UCD/latest/ucd/extracted/DerivedCombiningClass.txt>: > > 05D0..05EA ; 0 # Lo [27] HEBREW LETTER ALEF..HEBREW LETTER TAV > > In other words, 05EA with combining class 0 is blocking the composition and > any reordering between > > (0061 0305 0315 0300) on one side, and > > (0062) on the other side (which is also combining class 0). > > So you will effectively get the composition of 0061 and 0305 (because it is > also no specifically excluded from composition in CompositionExclusions.txt > <http://www.unicode.org/Public/UCD/latest/ucd/CompositionExclusions.txt>) in: > > toNFC(0061 0305 0315 0300 05AE 0062), > > but NOT in: > > toNFC(0061 05AE 0305 0315 0300 0062). > > I think you have mixed the two separate test cases. > > > The first thing to check is to break sequences before every character with > combining class 0 (even if it is "combining", like here the Hebrew accent > zinor). > > 2014-03-10 19:34 GMT+01:00 Markus Doppelbauer <[email protected]>: > >> Hello, >> >> I am working on an Unicode Normalization implemenation. I have a question >> about a specific toNFC test rule. >> >> toNFC(0061 0305 0315 0300 05AE 0062) => >> (0061 05AE 0305 0300 0315 0062) >> expected: >> (0061 05AE 0305 0300 0315 0062) >> \-------------/ => >> (00E0 05AE 0305 0315 0062) >> >> Why doesn't 0061 and 0300 combine to 00E0 ? >> >> Thanks a lot >> Markus >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Unicode mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
