> From: [email protected] (Per Starbäck)
> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:32:15 +0100
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>
> Regarding these names in ISO 6429 again, how come these control
> characters don't have Unicode names?
They have a non-empty "old name" field:
0000;<control>;Cc;0;BN;;;;;N;NULL;;;;
^^^^
> Emacs should do better regarding this
As you yourself say, it already does, so I don't see the point in this
rant.
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
