From: Denis Jacquerye Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 13:48:39 +0000 > The Syriac in Greek script shown in > http://www.bethmardutho.org/index.php/hugoye/volume-index/585.html > (which the fr.wiktionary.org articles are citing) has underlined chi > and underlined sigma, not chi macron below or sigma macron below. > See page 48: “For characters not found in the Greek alphabet, > underlining is employed: the he is represented by underlined ch, and > shin by underlined sigma.” > Given what was mentioned so far here, one might assume this could be a > macron below with a specific positioning instead of underline, but > that would be just that: assumptions.
See now http://tinyurl.com/py72z7w !… > It would be interesting the see original documents to have a better > idea of what these should look like. I wasn’t able to find anything about this Mgr Butrus Gemayel’s book ! On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Michael Everson wrote: > On 17 Mar 2014, at 00:51, Richard BUDELBERGER wrote: > >> So if I ask somebody to create and sell a character set with ḇ ḏ ẖ ḵ ḻ ṉ ṟ ṯ >> ẕ σ̱ ς̱ χ̱ and their capitals, Unicode should add them (σ̱ ς̱ χ̱ and H̱ Σ̱ >> Χ̱) for compatibility ?… > > No. > >> There was the same problem with Yoruba letters with U+0329 « ̩ », and with >> the new Marshallese alphabet with U+0326 « ̦ ». > > Yes, there is. See http://www.unicover.com/ecatimag/MI-C309-.jpg & https://fr.wiktionary.org/wiki/Category:marshallais ! > Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/ > -- Denis Moyogo Jacquerye _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
