If you think there is a problem with OpenType and Singala, the place to bring that up is on the OpenType list - not the Unicode list.
There are often several different ways of accomplishing things with OpenType - and how you do them also depends on how you design the font. Creating and Supporting OpenType Fonts for Sinhala Script <http://www.microsoft.com/typography/OpenTypeDev/sinhala/intro.htm> is not part of the OpenType specification it is just a guideline for creating OpenType Singhala fonts based on how Microsoft made their own Singhala font - but some other font maker could do things a little differently - as long as the text renders correctly with the font. If you have problems with the document itself and the use of terms - you should take that up with Microsoft typography and give them suggestions how to fix it. It was probably written by someone who makes the OpenType tables for fonts for many different scripts with no particular knowledge of the the Singhala language or of Sanskrit. On 04/04/2014, Naena Guru <[email protected]> wrote: > Here is the proof that OpenType standard defined the Singhala script > wrongly. Also find a BNF grammar that describes it. > http://ahangama.com/unicode/index.htm > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
