On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Mark Davis ☕️ <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think you have a point here. We should probably change to: > > To meet this requirement, an implementation shall supply a mechanism for > specifying any Unicode scalar value (from U+0000 to U+D7FF and U+E000 to > U+10FFFF), using the hexadecimal code point representation. > > and then in the notes say that the same notation can be used for > codepoints that are not scalar values, for implementation that handle them > in Unicode strings. > This combination sounds good. markus
_______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
