On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Karl Williamson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks, I had not thought about that. I'm thinking wording something like > this is more appropriate > > "Noncharacters may be openly interchanged, but it is inadvisable to do so > without prior agreement, since at each stage any of them might be replaced > by a REPLACEMENT CHARACTER or otherwise disposed of, at the sole discretion > of that stage's implementation." I think that would invite again the kinds of implementations that triggered Corrigendum #9, where you couldn't use CLDR files with Gnome-based tools (plain text editors, file diff tools, command-line terminal) if the files contained noncharacters. (CLDR data uses them for boundary mappings in collation data.) markus
_______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
