ok, here the simplified version of my question: would U+1F21A followed by U+FE0E be represented differently from what U+1F21A is normally?
is such sequence even a real concern or intent specified anywhere? (no, can't find it, asking just confirmation) Thanks a lot for any outcome! Best Regards On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Andrea Giammarchi < [email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > this is my first email in this channel so apologies in advance if > already discussed. > > I am trying to understand the expected behavior when there an "unexpected > VS15" after emoji that have not been defined, accordingly with this file > http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/NamesList.txt, as VS15 sensitive. > > My take on FE0E is that all emoji that are sensible to this variant, have > an "emojified" counter part that should be used when followed by FE0F and > vice-versa a textual part when followed by FE0E, but all other emoji should > not consider such variant at all since there's no textual counter part to > represent, let's say, a 1F21A pile-of-poo > > "\ud83d\udca9\ufe0e" > > Can anyone please confirm my expectations are correct so that above > sequence in both Java or JavaScript will show the POP emoji regardless, > followed by FE0E variant that will be simply ignored and actually no > device/OS/render/viewer/browser would ever create such sequence so it's > actually a non problem, this one I am trying to solve? > > Thanks in advance and Best Regards >
_______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
