Out of scope of Unicode, Please stop inventing new things and posting them heren that do not conform to the encoding rules: all encoded characters need to demonstrate their acutal usage accessible to a sizeable community (or expected to be used widely such as new currency symbols).
Emojis have been encoded because they are widely used (their graphical aspect does not matter much, even their color, so you can expect differences for example between their use in Google Hangouts, smartphones under Android, Windows or iOS, instant messengers, email agents and websites (the web is full of collections of emojis with various styles, and users on some sites can also choose their preferred thematic collection for the same emojis). Emojis have passed the test being abstract characters because they convey the same meaning under these various styles. And most importantly, they do not need special learning by users to understand them in most cases, as they are explicit (in their context of use, which may influence them, just like letters are contextually read and understood in words or sentences). What you propose is just personal "art" and artistis creations are out of scope of Emojis, and your example glyphs have no usage except you, and are unreadable except by you.
_______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
