On 09/20/2014 03:32 AM, Mark Davis ☕️ wrote:
I agree that we should minute at least some reason for declining. It
need only be a sentence or two.

I would hope that the requesters get a detailed explanation of the rejection. It would be very wrong not to do so. If so, then the minutes could just copy and paste, deleting unnecessary detail.

(BTW I wasn't at that discussion.)

{phone}

On Sep 20, 2014 3:17 AM, "Asmus Freytag" <asm...@ix.netcom.com
<mailto:asm...@ix.netcom.com>> wrote:

    On 9/19/2014 5:38 PM, Whistler, Ken wrote:

        Michael,

            "Declines to take action” is pretty thin.

        A proposal which is declined by the UTC doesn't automatically
        create an obligation to write an extended dissertation explaining
        the rationale and putting that rationale on record. It might be
        one thing if there were a lot of controversy involved, and one
        group of participants asked for a rationale to be recorded,
        despite not having a consensus to move on something -- but
        this one wasn't even close. Nobody in the committee felt
        encoding was justified in this case.

        And not every mark on paper -- not even every mark *printed*
        in typeset material on paper -- is automatically an obvious
        candidate for encoding with a simple, plain text character
        representation.


    True, but a rationale (note that's not necessarily a dissertation)
    never hurts.

    "Declines to take action” may look like it is equivalent to "Nobody
    in the committee felt
    encoding was justified in this case", but it really isn't. The
    former allows for all sorts of non-substantive reasons, but the
    latter is pretty clear: the submitter failed to make the case.

    What you are looking for is something equivalent to "summary
    dismissal" of a legal action, but even there this usually gets some
    rationale or it has the benefit of a standardized legal principle
    (don't know for a fact, but sounds plausible).



    A./


        --Ken


        _________________________________________________
        Unicode mailing list
        Unicode@unicode.org <mailto:Unicode@unicode.org>
        http://unicode.org/mailman/__listinfo/unicode
        <http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode>


    _________________________________________________
    Unicode mailing list
    Unicode@unicode.org <mailto:Unicode@unicode.org>
    http://unicode.org/mailman/__listinfo/unicode
    <http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode>



_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode


_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode

Reply via email to