On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Aaron Cannon < [email protected]> wrote:
> 0061 05AE 0305 0300 0315 0062 http://unicode.org/cldr/utility/list-unicodeset.jsp?a=%5Cu0061+%5Cu05AE+%5Cu0305+%5Cu0300+%5Cu0315+%5Cu0062&g=ccc 0305 and 0300 have the same ccc, so the first one blocks the second. http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode7.0.0/ch03.pdf#G49576 The older spec is shorter, although not as precise: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr15/tr15-29.html#Specification Mark <https://google.com/+MarkDavis> *— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
_______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
