On Oct 24, 2014, at 8:18 AM, Peter Constable wrote: > From: Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Tom Gewecke > >> If someone wants to publish and sell a book in which they say something like >> "This is how Unicode suggests that character U+XXXX is supposed to look:" > > Well, since the intent of the codes is to give indication of what the > character identity is and _not_ to say how the character _should_ look, then > it's a good thing if Unicode isn't authors to make such statements.
I probably didn't express myself clearly before. Even if the book simply says "The charts published by Uncode.org indicate that the following would be a representative glyph for the Character U+XXXX", it seems that you would need permission to copy the glyph. I wonder if that is necessary. _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list Unicode@unicode.org http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
