Philippe Verdy wrote:
Attention ! You've only isted the catalog entry, but not the actua reference http://www.boutique.afnor.org/norme/xp-z44-002/code-pour-la-representation-des-noms-de-pays-historiques/article/748631/fa046190
It was a start. Your reference is clearly better.
Which gives information about context of use (mainly for bibliographic purpose, not for linguistic/terminologic purpose)
I don't think Jörg specified the exact purpose to which he wanted to apply this information.
and with a limited timeframe (starting from 1815 up to but excluding current countries encoced in ISO 3166-1 and their divisions).
Jörg said, "anything going beyond 1974 (ISO 3166-3) will be better than nothing." 1815 qualifies.
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, USA | http://ewellic.org _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
