Tim Partridge <[email protected]> writes: > Antoine Méric said >> I was wondering, has the question « Given the massive usage over > time >> of the glyph, and the number of academic papers about it, should we > consider >>adding a PHALLIC REPRESENTATION to the unicode standard ? » ever been > asked ? > > The Ancient Egyptians had some glyphs to act as determinatives for > words that relate to that topic, and they are encoded in the standard. > See U+130B8 to A.
Good grief, I don’t like the look of U+130B9. Maybe I don’t want to know what’s going on 🙉. -- Ian ◎ _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
