On 03/28/2015 02:25 PM, Asmus Freytag (t) wrote:
Unless there is a value in documenting the value of the numerator and
denominator, in which case this should be prominently explained in the
documentation.
It seems to me that the character name provides sufficient documentation
of the numerator and denominator
Or is that written down somewhere already?
A./
On 3/28/2015 1:05 PM, Karl Williamson wrote:
In the 8.0 Beta files, some numerical values are not reduced to their
lowest forms. Is there a compelling reason that
109FB;MEROITIC CURSIVE FRACTION SIX TWELFTHS;No;0;R;;;;6/12;N;;;;;
is not written as
109FB;MEROITIC CURSIVE FRACTION SIX TWELFTHS;No;0;R;;;;1/2;N;;;;;
given that there is also a
109BD;MEROITIC CURSIVE FRACTION ONE HALF;No;0;R;;;;1/2;N;;;;;
Aren't the numeric values of U+109FB and U+109BD the same?
Existing software that looks at the numeric values of characters is
written expecting that rational numbers will have been reduced to
their lowest form.
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
