On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:09 AM John <[email protected]> wrote: > Mostly just a matter of upgrading the character size.
Which totally blows any concern with text size out of the water. Using 30 bytes to define certain very rare characters and 1 byte to define ASCII is way better then using 8 bytes to define all characters. I think this stuff could be relatively easy to define and standardise. You > could basically define the entire technology in 1 A4 document. People have > just got to want it badly enough to agree on it, and give it the imprimatur > of the consortium. > > Then define it. It doesn't need Unicode involved at all, unless nobody really wants it enough to use it without it getting tossed into the Unicode package.
