On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Peter Constable <[email protected]> wrote:
> There is a new thread on the topic of using characters to give abstract > representation of semantic propositions that can be rendered as sentences > in various languages — so called “localizable sentences”. This idea has > been brought up repeatedly over several years now and has gained no > traction as having potential for a Unicode encoding proposal. To having > this topic continually re-opened is tiresome; it’s a form of spam on this > list, degrading the experience for all who come to the list to discuss > reasonable proposals or to get help with real usage scenarios. I wonder if > you might want to consider putting a moratorium on further discussion of > this topic. > I strongly agree. It is simply a waste of time. (Even though I have blacklisted Overington on my email, I still get other people responding to him.) Mark <https://google.com/+MarkDavis>
