Thanks Doug. That's very helpful. On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 at 17:07 Doug Ewell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Disclaimer: These are only suggestions. I've never submitted a character > proposal. You should prefer the advice of people who have, or of UTC > members who evaluate proposals. > > Noah Slater <nslater at tumbolia dot org> wrote: > > > Previously in this thread, it was suggested that I make a formal > > proposal to the UTC. I have held back from doing this because it's not > > at all clear what implementation I should be proposing, or whether I > > can propose something WITHOUT an implementation. (Some advise there > > would be handy!) > > If by "implementation" you mean a suggestion for how Unicode should > encode this flag (single character, extension to the PRI #299 mechanism > similar to what Ken proposed, or something else), it might be a good > idea to summarize the options and choose at least one "preferred" > option. > > > Should I trust that the UTC will be aware of the informal proposal of > > the rainbow flag when they meet to discuss PRI #299, or should I do > > something to properly bring it to their attention? > > As Mark Davis wrote [1], this list is not a venue for formally proposing > anything, and it's not safe to assume that UTC members have read this > list and have any background. If you want to state something, make sure > you state it in the proposal. You can quote and paraphrase list > discussions, but don't just insert links to the list archive. > > [1] http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2015-m07/0033.html > > -- > Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸 > >
