On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 14:46:31 +0300 "Erkki I Kolehmainen" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry, but I find myself having a serious problem in understanding > what this is about. In some cases the TUS lays down in detail the order of characters and their interpretation. While Europeans have canonical combining classes to standardise the order of combining marks, lesser breeds tend not to receive them. It gets even worse when combining marks are defined by the combination of control character(s) and what appears to be a base character. For example, the order for the Khmer script was laid down in great detail. Similarly, the order for Burmese was laid out in great detail. However, as support for other languages was added to the 'Myanmar' script, the ordering rules to cover the new characters were not promptly laid down. So the question is, how does one rectify the situation where the text in the Unicode Standard for a script is woefully inadequate. Richard.
