Mark Davis 🍾 wrote: > However, if it ends up not being added as a BCP47 variant, one could > file a ticket for consideration as a BCP47 locale variant. The syntax > would be a bit different, eg en-u-va-plain vs en-plain.
To clarify, this would be an extension-U subtag in accordance with RFC 6067. I'm confused how "plain English" (or German or what have you) represents any sort of aspect of a locale. Is "special variant" that open-ended? -- Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
