On 10/4/2015 4:14 PM, Richard
Wordingham wrote:
respect to what to erase or undo.For sequences that belong to a given language, you can pick the behavior that makes most sense in them, but for lone surrogates, by definition you are dealing with broken text that doesn't follow any conventions.Who's 'you'? Customisation is frequently not available. In fact, I don't recall seeing it on offer. The UI developer. And there's nothing Unicode can do about lack of customizability. A,./ |
- Re: Deleting Lone Surrogates Richard Wordingham
- Re: Deleting Lone Surrogates Asmus Freytag (t)
- Re: Deleting Lone Surrogates Richard Wordingham
- Scope of Unicode Character Properties (was: Re... Ken Whistler
- Re: Deleting Lone Surrogates Philippe Verdy
- Re: Deleting Lone Surrogates Markus Scherer
- Re: Deleting Lone Surrogates Philippe Verdy
- Re: Deleting Lone Surrogates Richard Wordingham
- Re: Deleting Lone Surrogates Asmus Freytag (t)
- Re: Deleting Lone Surrogates Richard Wordingham
- Re: Deleting Lone Surrogates Asmus Freytag (t)
- Re: Deleting Lone Surrogates Richard Wordingham
- Re: Deleting Lone Surrogates Asmus Freytag (t)
- Re: Deleting Lone Surrogates Richard Wordingham
- Re: Deleting Lone Surrogates Martin J. Dürst
- Re: Deleting Lone Surrogates Philippe Verdy
- Re: Deleting Lone Surrogates Asmus Freytag (t)
- Re: Deleting Lone Surrogates Richard Wordingham