Thank you! Yes, that's an implicit part of the "I'd like feedback from the people involved" :-)
In fact, if such a GET parameter existed, I could remove the dialog and replace it with a simple link. This sounds like a good idea in principle. (It would also fix Leo Broukhis' issue.) Does anyone know, who is in charge of the actual form on the server, so that I can get in touch? Cheers, Manuel 2015-12-18 8:23 GMT+01:00 Max Truxa <[email protected]>: > If that's the only reason to post the form yourself, you could request the > addition of an optional get parameter on the adoption page. If it's clear > that this parameter is intended to be used by third party services the > "stability problem" would be solved. > > Otherwise, great idea! > Thanks for the comment! > > > As far as I'm concerned, the pop-up contents should end with the link > > "Read more about codepoint adoption." In your brief description, you > > might want to add a proviso about the temporary nature of character > > adoption. > Good catch! The 12-month period is important to mention. Putting the > "Read more" at the end sounds good to me, too. > > Submitting forms to a 3rd party site is a bad idea. > In principle I agree, But here I do that on purpose (the purpose being > to prefill the "codepoint to adopt" field). Since the form on the > adoption landing page doesn't fill in values given via form submit, I > decided to re-build it and let it post directly to the next step. > > -Manuel >
