Fixed it in Wikipedia (I used "canonically equivalent" and linked it to the relevant article, instead of the imprecise expression "the result of").
2016-02-09 20:29 GMT+01:00 Markus Scherer <[email protected]>: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 3:18 AM, ACJ Unicode <[email protected]> wrote: > >> [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IJ_(digraph)#Stress >> > > This says "in Unicode <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode> it is > possible to combine characters > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combining_character>into a *j* with an > acute accent – "bíȷ́na" – though this might not be supported or rendered > correctly by some fonts <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_font> or > systems. This *ȷ́* is the result of the combination of the dotless *ȷ* > (U+0237) > and the combining acute accent ́ (U+0301)." > > which I am pretty sure is wrong. It should read "in Unicode > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode> it is possible to combine > characters <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combining_character>into a *j* with > an acute accent – "bíj́na" – though this might not be supported or > rendered correctly by some fonts > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_font> or systems. This *j́* is > the result of the combination of the regular *j* and the combining acute > accent ́ (U+0301)." > > Could someone with Wikipedia edit experience please fix this? (3 edits in > the sentence) > > markus >
