On 15/02/2016, David Faulks <[email protected]> wrote: > .....(there was actually a discussion about encoding it back in 2000 on this > mailing list).
Presumably that indicates at least 15 years of usage - far longer than most emoji. - Chris
On 15/02/2016, David Faulks <[email protected]> wrote: > .....(there was actually a discussion about encoding it back in 2000 on this > mailing list).
Presumably that indicates at least 15 years of usage - far longer than most emoji. - Chris