On 13 May 2016, at 18:31, Ori Avtalion <[email protected]> wrote: > Any plans for Rashi Script? It doesn't seem to fit any of the > categories you listed. Arguably, it's just a font, but there's > precedence in Unicode :)
Not good precedent, I think. Rashi would be best considered like Fraktur and Latin. Michael Everson
