|
On 6/6/2016 9:09 AM, Markus Scherer
wrote:
There is a difference in guaranteeing that "is" is not the leading part of a property value alias and in supporting a match. I agree that requiring (or suggesting) such a thing is questionable. (Esp. in light of what ICU does). However, making sure that those that follow that conventions can continue to do so with future aliases *is* reasonable. A./ |
- UAX44: loose matching of symbolic values and the `is` p... Mathias Bynens
- Re: UAX44: loose matching of symbolic values and t... srivas sinnathurai
- Re: UAX44: loose matching of symbolic values and t... Ken Whistler
- Re: UAX44: loose matching of symbolic values a... Mathias Bynens
- Re: UAX44: loose matching of symbolic values and t... Doug Ewell
- Re: UAX44: loose matching of symbolic values a... Mathias Bynens
- Re: UAX44: loose matching of symbolic valu... Markus Scherer
- Re: UAX44: loose matching of symbolic ... Asmus Freytag (c)
- Re: UAX44: loose matching of symbolic values a... Nova Patch
- Re: UAX44: loose matching of symbolic valu... Mathias Bynens
- Re: UAX44: loose matching of symbolic values and t... Doug Ewell
- Re: UAX44: loose matching of symbolic values a... Mathias Bynens
- RE: UAX44: loose matching of symbolic values and t... Doug Ewell

