Hi Phillipe, On Saturday, 11 June 2016, Philippe Verdy <[email protected]> wrote:
> OK, <ONE;combining TEENS> represents 11, but <ONE;combining TENS> is not clearly represents 10, and the proposals do not exhibit 10 with the same glyph as PU (even if it is based on it, in fact the combining TENS is a small subscript glyph variant of letter/syllable PU intended to mark digits). > Mende Kikakui script disolays a high degree of glyph variation. Some variations minor, some variations more substantive. The syllable PU can be found as it is in the charts, it can be found looking like the number 10. Other variations are also observed. The ideal situation would have been to encode the number 10. But in its absence, I guess ONE+TENS may be the approach. Even though it seems less than ideal. A. A. -- Andrew Cunningham [email protected]
