On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 13:25:17 +1000, Andrew Cunningham wrote: > Marcel, it isn't so much that the conversation was exhausted, rather that > the original question has been sufficienlty answered.
I understand the difference now. Anyway I didnʼt consider the issue as settled. More, the Mende Kikakui number encoding default as pointed in the original thread would IMHO have been far, far less likely to occur if the first public review would be scheduled at a more useful stage than the beta one. I donʼt know if people feel being taken seriously when their feedback is solicited while almost all striking parameters are yet immutable. And I guess that some of those who are ready to spend a part of their time for Unicodeʼs and character encodingʼs sake, wouldnʼt necessarily do so unless they are solicited and given the material in a handsome format. Perhaps would a Public Alpha Review prevent things from running worse? Beta will be reviewed again of course, but in a less frustrating manner. Marcel
