Hello,
This discrepancy was addressed during the release process. Please refer to the published Version 9.0 of UAX #29 and the UCD files. Regards, L. -----Original Message----- From: Unicode [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniel Bünzli Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 2:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: UAX29 9.0.0 Grapheme cluster spec & test discrepancy Hello, It seems there's a discrepancy between the tests and the spec for grapheme clusters. In http://www.unicode.org/Public/9.0.0/ucd/auxiliary/GraphemeBreakTest.txt we have: ÷ 261D × 0308 × 1F3FB ÷ # ÷ [0.2] WHITE UP POINTING INDEX (E_Base) # × [9.0] COMBINING DIAERESIS (Extend) # × [10.0] EMOJI MODIFIER FITZPATRICK TYPE-1-2 (E_Modifier) ÷ [0.3] which is http://www.unicode.org/Public/9.0.0/ucd/auxiliary/GraphemeBreakTest.html#r10.0 but the spec doesn't talk about interleaved Extend*: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/proposed.html#GB10 It seems following the spec this would be: ÷ 261D × 0308 ÷ 1F3FB ÷ which one is right ? Best, Daniel
