On 10 August 2016 at 12:21, Costello, Roger L. <[email protected]> wrote: > > Do you know if there is another version of the symbol, but with a straight > equals sign rather than a slanted equals sign? (The book that I referred to > uses a straight equals sign not a slanted equals sign)
No, but there are lots of standardized variants for mathematical glyph variants of this sort (see first section of http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/StandardizedVariants.txt), so you could ask the UTC to define two more mathematical standardized variants: 2A7F FE00; with straight equal; # LESS-THAN OR SLANTED EQUAL TO WITH DOT INSIDE 2A80 FE00; with straight equal; # GREATER-THAN OR SLANTED EQUAL TO WITH DOT INSIDE Then all you would need is to get someone to support the new standardized variants in a math font. Andrew
