On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Michael Everson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 29 Aug 2016, at 20:33, Mark Davis ☕️ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > There have been dinosaur proposals; the emoji subcommittee is still > looking at the priorities among animals. > > Andrew West’s dinosaur proposal was spot-on in its scope and prediction > for popularity and usage. Having only one dinosaur emoji doesn’t make any > sense taxonomically or in fact being realistic about user preferences. > And the distinctions could reasonably be made at typical emoji sizes.
