Janusz Bień wrote: > For me it means that Swift's characters are equivalence classes of the > set of extended grapheme clusters by canonical equivalence relation.
I still hope we can come to some conclusion on the correct Unicode name for this concept. I don't think non-Unicode interpretations of terms like "grapheme" are grounds for throwing out "grapheme cluster," but I can see that the equivalence class itself is lacking a name. Note that the Swift definition doesn't say that <00E9> and <0065 0301> are identical entities, only that the language compares them as equal. -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
