I am disappointed with Noto Mono, which only covers Latin script, and not Greek, and Cyrillic when most existing monospace fonts do.
On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Philippe Verdy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2016-10-09 8:17 GMT+02:00 Luke Dashjr <[email protected]>: > >> On Sunday, October 09, 2016 4:37:24 AM Philippe Verdy wrote: >> > The licence itself says it respects the 4 FSF freedoms. It also >> explicitly >> > allows reselling (rule DFSG #1): >> > http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=OFL >> >> No, it doesn't. That link is just a commentary, and of no relevance to >> non- >> SIL-owned fonts. >> > > The link is the one directly used on the Noto description page when it > refers to the OFL licence. It is not saying that it is only for SIL-owned > fonts. Google/Monotype would have linked to another page if needed but this > is the most relevant one explicitly stated by Google on the Noto site. >
