On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:39 AM, gfb hjjhjh <[email protected]> wrote:
> So, according to the emoji FAQ > <http://unicode.org/faq/emoji_dingbats.html>, the end goal of emoji is to > have no emoji? Or something like Softbank's escape sequence? > >Q: What is the longer term plan for emoji? > >A: The Unicode Consortium encourages the use of embedded graphics (a.k.a. > “stickers”) as a longer-term solution, since they allow much more freedom > of expression. See Longer Term Solutions > <http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr51/#Longer_Term> in UTR #51 > <http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr51/>. > > btw is it just me or is the original Japanese carrier emoji, specifically > those provided by DoCoMo, still not completely coded into Unicode? I > counted the number of I-mode emoji listed on Japanese Wikipedia in the tron > code section and there're apparently more emoji than those that are in > emoji but I don't know which is missing. > Shibuya 109 was left out because AIUI, unlike the other landmarks, it's private property. Are there any others?
