Given the status of WAP, I don't think there is any particular need to seek compatibility for it. On the other hand, it — like other sources — can certainly be mined for ideas. For example, the topic of SCUBA has certainly come up, and I suspect one could make a good case for the expected frequency being similar to some other sports.
See http://unicode.org/emoji/selection.html for how to submit. Mark On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:39 AM, Christoph Päper < [email protected]> wrote: > Christoph Päper <[email protected]> 2016-01-07: > > > > I just discovered the WAP Pictogram specification (WAP-213-WAPInterPic), > last published in April 2001 and updated in November 2001. > > There was a subsequent update by OMA in 2006, but it didn’t change any > pictogram. > > > Reading through section 7 Pictogram Set, it’s obvious that WAP > pictograms have been unified with Japanese (i-mode) emojis upon their > encoding in Unicode 6+. > > There were references to WAP in L2/07-257 and L2/08-081, for instance. > > > However, the mapping is not obvious in all cases and I think there are > some pictograms that have been omitted / forgotten or could have better > annotation, > > I’ve put my best guesses for equivalent emojis onto Github: > > <https://github.com/Crissov/unicode-proposals/blob/master/ > references/WAP%20Pictogram.tsv> > > I still think there are some entries without proper corresponding emoji. > Would that suffice as a reason for adding them? > > - animal/beetle – unless same as animal/ladybird 🐞 > - emotion/shakenHeart – unless beating heart 💓 is appropriate > - emotion/shine – Sparkles ✨ may or may not be appropriate > - map/park – maybe Fountain ⛲️, not obvious > - map/zoo – perhaps any non-pet animal > - music/rest – is that what 〽️ or 〰️ means? > - sport/scuba > > >
