On 4/5/2017 1:18 AM, Elias Mårtenson
wrote:
Dear Elias, Unicode is not an archive of anything ever used on computers. If there's a credible need to convert files
between Unicode-based systems and those using PETSCII with full
round-trip convertibility, then that _might_ constitute a case
for encoding. A similar scenario might exist if C64 emulators
run on Unicode-based systesm were a widespread phenomenon, in
which case having a standardized Unicode representation for the
missing code points might be in scope. I cannot speculate whether the UTC would find a proposal to that effect compelling, it would depend on the user community affected and the specific evidence adduced in support. A./ |
- PETSCII mapping? Elias Mårtenson
- Re: PETSCII mapping? Asmus Freytag
- Re: PETSCII mapping? Rebecca Bettencourt
- Re: PETSCII mapping? Rebecca Bettencourt
- Re: PETSCII mapping? James Kass
- Re: PETSCII mapping? Elias Mårtenson
- Re: PETSCII mapping? Rebecca Bettencourt
- Re: PETSCII mapping? Rebecca T
- Re: PETSCII mapping? Elias Mårtenson
- Re: PETSCII mapping? Rebecca Bettencourt
- Re: PETSCII mapping? Elias Mårtenson
- Re: PETSCII mapping? Alastair Houghton