On 4/10/2017 9:30 AM, Peter Constable wrote:
From: Unicode [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Asmus Freytag
Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 5:30 PM
There are certainly MSS (in many languages) where some punctuation made of dots
have some of the dots red and some black.
Agreed, those would be a challenge to reproduce with standard font technology
and in plain text.
Not at all. This capability has existed in all major OS platforms for some
years now.
It may be in the platforms, but of the few clients I've tried this with,
only one is reliably supporting this.
It is what has enabled the growth of interest in Unicode emoji, but it is by
no means limited to Unicode emoji: it can be used for multi-color rendering of
any text in ways defined within a font. The OpenType spec supports this through
a few techniques:
- Decomposing a glyph into several glyphs that are layered (z-ordered) with
colour assignments.
- Glyphs expressed as embedded colour bitmaps.
- Glyphs expressed as embedded SVG.
Khaled gave a very nice demonstration of that on this list (which
allowed me to test this).
But for the same reason, they are out of scope for plain text (and therefore a
bit irrelevant to the current discussion).
I agree, the rendering aspect is completely orthogonal to Unicode plain-text
encoding.
The problem with multicolored fonts would be the integration into font
color selection via styling.
http://www.amirifont.org/fatiha-colored.html
If you select a section of this text, the black ink will invert as you
select it, but the other colors remain the same, which is different from
selecting a multicolored image or different from selecting multiple runs
of fonts in different colors.
I wonder whether high-end tools like Indesign would be able to allow
styling of individual color levels. For rendering emoji colors via fonts
that wouldn't matter, but for the kind of annotated text example, it
could be interesting to be able to tweak these layer colors.
A./
Peter
